Datahopa

Computer Related => PC Hardware => Topic started by: Carl2 on September 04, 2010, 13:33:26 PM

Title: SSD Charts 2010
Post by: Carl2 on September 04, 2010, 13:33:26 PM
  A set of benchmark charts at Tomshardware, includes 17 models. 
http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/ssd-charts-2010/benchmarks,110.html

  Interesting for someone buying or just trying to keep up.
Carl2
Title: Re: SSD Charts 2010
Post by: Data on September 04, 2010, 14:38:59 PM
Excellent, that's going to be useful, if im reading the results right it seems that the Crucial RealSSD C300 256GB has the crown right now on most results.   
Title: Re: SSD Charts 2010
Post by: Carl2 on September 05, 2010, 12:43:58 PM
   The Crucial reals do seem the best, to get top performance you need the USB 3.  The price of the Crucials has dropped since thay were introduced and are more competive.  I noticed the charts have changed, the setup of the equiptment is gone and all the helpful comments are missing.
Carl2
Title: Re: SSD Charts 2010
Post by: Snowcrash on September 05, 2010, 15:38:59 PM
I still like the idea of the Intel SSDs. Though their score for thoughput when full is low. The market is still changing loads.
I'm still sceptical about buying yet. Need a price decrease to move the market quicker and I'm not sure the confidence is there yet.
My next rig is sheduled to about this time next year (see what processors are gonna do) and I will consider buying then.
Title: Re: SSD Charts 2010
Post by: Carl2 on September 06, 2010, 13:29:50 PM
  Above I had said USB 3 and should have said Sata 3 for the SSD's,  Crucial is using Sata 3, it has about 9 models out with I Sata 3 from Micron.  SSD's do reduce the startup load time where faster Hd's do not, raid 0 will not which for me brings up questions without answers.
  Good luck with your next rig.
Carl2